AI-Powered IDEs: Cursor, Windsurf, Copilot & Kiro Compared

The Era of Agentic Coding

The role of the Integrated Development Environment (IDE) has fundamentally changed. For decades, IDEs were sophisticated text editors—highlighting syntax, finding references, and managing builds. Today, they are active partners in the engineering process.

We have moved from tools that “assist” to agents that “collaborate.”

Modern AI-powered IDEs like Cursor, Windsurf, and Copilot don’t just autocomplete lines; they understand entire codebases, refactor complex legacy systems, and implement features across multiple files autonomously. This shift—what we call “Agentic Coding”—is the most significant change in software development since the introduction of IntelliSense.

This is the reality of coding in December 2025. And if you’re still editing files one line at a time, wondering what all the AI IDE fuss is about—you’re in the right place.

By the end of this guide, you’ll understand:

• How we got from basic autocomplete to AI that can complete your projects
• The major players: Copilot, Cursor, Windsurf, and the new wave (Antigravity, Kiro, Trae)
• Which tool fits your workflow, budget, and coding style
• Practical tips to actually get 55%+ productivity gains (backed by research)
• Where this is all heading—the agentic future of coding

Let’s dive in.

Watch the video summary of this article

35:20 Learn AI Series

Watch on YouTube

Understanding Agentic Coding (The Key Concept)

Before we compare tools, let’s understand the fundamental shift happening right now. The term “agentic” has become the most important word in AI coding tools for 2025.

Here’s a more detailed breakdown of what makes agentic coding different:

Traditional AI Assistants (2021-2023)

Think of this as having a very smart autocomplete:

• You type function validateEmail(
• AI completes email) { return /^[^\s@]+@[^\s@]+\.[^\s@]+$/.test(email); }
• You accept or reject the suggestion
• You’re still doing all the thinking about what to build

Modern Agentic AI (2024-2025)

Think of this as having a junior developer on your team:

• You say: “Add email validation to the signup form with proper error messages”
• AI plans: “I’ll need to modify the signup component, create a validation utility, add error state…”
• AI executes: Reads your existing code, understands patterns, modifies multiple files
• AI verifies: Runs the app, checks for errors, iterates if needed
• You review: Accept the changes, or give feedback to refine

The shift is from AI as a typing assistant to AI as a coding partner. For a deeper exploration of this paradigm, see the AI Agents guide.

From Tab-Complete to AI-Complete: A Brief History

To appreciate where we are, it helps to understand how fast this evolution happened.

The Pre-AI Era (Before 2021)

Remember IntelliSense? Language servers? The magic of typing a dot after an object and seeing its methods pop up?

That was cutting-edge not too long ago. These tools were smart—they understood your code structure, could suggest method signatures, auto-import dependencies. But they were fundamentally pattern matchers. No understanding of what you were trying to accomplish.

A helpful analogy: Pre-AI autocomplete was like a dictionary that could tell you how to spell words—but had no idea what sentence you were trying to write.

The Copilot Moment (June 2021)

Then GitHub launched Copilot—and everything changed.

For the first time, your editor could suggest entire lines and functions based on context. You’d write a comment like // function to validate email address and Copilot would generate the implementation.

The numbers were striking:

• Developers completed tasks 55% faster in controlled studies
• 88% of users reported completing tasks faster (Source: GitHub Research)
• Pull request merge time dropped from 9.6 days to 2.4 days in enterprise studies

It felt like magic. It also felt unreliable. Early Copilot had a habit of suggesting code that looked right but was subtly wrong. Still—the potential was obvious.

The Competition Arrives (2022-2023)

Other players noticed. Codeium launched with a generous free tier. Tabnine evolved. Amazon entered with CodeWhisperer. The AI coding assistant market exploded.

But these were all variations on the same theme: inline code completion. Helpful, but limited.

The Agentic Shift (2024-2025)

The real revolution came when AI IDEs stopped just suggesting code and started understanding projects.

Cursor IDE emerged as a fork of VS Code with AI built into its DNA. Their “Composer” feature let you describe changes in natural language and apply them across multiple files. Their “Agent” mode could read your codebase, run terminal commands, and iterate autonomously.

Windsurf (from Codeium) introduced “Cascade”—an agentic system that combines AI suggestions with autonomous action, but with guardrails for safety.

November 2025: The Agent-First Era Arrives

Then, in a flurry of announcements, the next generation arrived:

• Google Antigravity (Nov 18, 2025): A full “agent-first” IDE with autonomous agents that can work for days on complex tasks
• Amazon Kiro (Nov 2025): “Spec-driven development” that turns requirements into production code
• Trae (ByteDance): Free access to GPT-4o and Claude models for everyone

We’ve moved from AI as autocomplete to AI as pair programmer—and rapidly toward AI as autonomous coding agent.

The Capability Ladder

Here’s how I think about the generations:

%%{init: {'theme': 'base', 'themeVariables': { 'primaryColor': '#4f46e5', 'primaryTextColor': '#ffffff', 'primaryBorderColor': '#3730a3', 'lineColor': '#6366f1', 'fontSize': '16px' }}}%%
flowchart LR
    A["Symbol Complete<br/>(Pre-2020)"] --> B["Line Complete<br/>(2021)"]
    B --> C["Function Generate<br/>(2023)"]
    C --> D["Multi-File Edit<br/>(2024)"]
    D --> E["Agentic Agents<br/>(2025)"]

GitHub Copilot + VS Code: The Pioneer (20M+ Users)

Let’s start with the tool that launched this revolution—and is now used by 90% of Fortune 100 companies.

What It Is

GitHub Copilot is Microsoft/GitHub’s AI coding assistant, built in partnership with OpenAI. It’s trained on billions of lines of public GitHub code and integrates natively into VS Code (and other editors).

By the numbers (as of December 2025):

• 20+ million users globally (5M added in just 3 months) (Source: GitHub Blog)
• 1.8+ million paid subscribers
• 50,000+ organizations using Copilot
• Used by 90% of Fortune 100 companies
• Enterprise adoption grew 75% quarter-over-quarter

Core Features (December 2025)

What Makes a Great Prompt for Copilot

Copilot works best when you give it context. Here’s the difference:

❌ Vague prompt:

// add validation

✅ Specific prompt:

// Validate email address format using regex
// Return true if valid, false otherwise
// Handle edge cases: empty string, missing @, multiple @
function validateEmail(email: string): boolean {

Copilot understands that comment and generates appropriate code. The more context you provide, the better the results.

Pricing (December 2025)

Available Models (December 2025)

• GPT-5.1-Codex-Max (GA) - Frontier coding model
• GPT-5.2, GPT-5.1 (GA)
• Claude Opus 4.5, Claude 3.7 (GA)
• Gemini 2.5 Pro (Pro+)

Where Copilot Excels

✅ Inline completions: Still best-in-class for speed and accuracy while typing

✅ Enterprise trust: Microsoft backing means easier corporate approval

✅ Language breadth: Excellent across Python, TypeScript, Go, Rust, Ruby, Java

✅ VS Code integration: Native, seamless, no extension conflicts

✅ Agent Mode: 🆕 Now supports autonomous multi-file task completion

✅ Copilot Memory: 🆕 Learns your codebase patterns over time

Where Copilot Falls Short

❌ Premium requests limited: Free/Pro tiers have monthly caps

❌ Model flexibility: Can’t bring your own API keys

💡 My Take (Updated December 2025): Copilot has significantly evolved with Agent Mode and Copilot Memory. The new Free tier makes it accessible to everyone, while Pro+ offers cutting-edge models. It’s now competitive with Cursor on features, though Cursor still leads in multi-file editing flexibility.

Cursor IDE: The Multi-File Editing Champion

Cursor is the tool that made me rethink how I code. And I’m not alone—it’s become the fastest-scaling SaaS company in history, with a valuation approaching $10 billion by late 2025 (Source: Industry Reports).

What Makes Cursor Different

Cursor is a fork of VS Code—it looks identical, uses the same extensions, supports the same keybindings. But under the hood, it’s rebuilt around AI.

By the numbers (December 2025):

• 1+ million users worldwide
• 360,000+ paying customers
• $200M+ projected revenue for 2025 (doubled from 2024)
• $2.6 billion valuation (January 2025), talks of $10B valuation underway
• Used by engineers at OpenAI, Shopify, Perplexity, Samsung, Midjourney
• 43% organizational adoption vs Copilot’s 37%
• 🆕 Acquired Graphite (code review tool) in December 2025

Where Copilot adds AI to VS Code, Cursor builds VS Code around AI.

Core Features (December 2025)

Enterprise Features (December 2025)

The Composer Revolution: A Practical Example

This is the feature that sets Cursor apart. Let me walk you through a real example.

The task: Add dark mode to a React app.

In Copilot, I’d need to:

1. Create a ThemeContext manually
2. Update styles in multiple components
3. Add a toggle component
4. Wire up localStorage persistence
5. Each step involves finding files, understanding patterns, writing code
6. Estimated time: 1-2 hours

In Cursor Composer, I type:

Add dark mode support to this React app. Create a ThemeContext, 
update the header and sidebar components to use theme colors,
add a toggle button in the settings page, and persist the 
user's preference to localStorage. Follow our existing patterns.

And Cursor:

1. Analyzes my codebase to understand the structure
2. Creates the ThemeContext file
3. Updates Header.tsx and Sidebar.tsx with theme variables
4. Creates or modifies the Settings component
5. Adds localStorage logic
6. Shows me diffs for all changes before applying
7. Estimated time: 10-15 minutes (including review)

I review, tweak if needed, and accept. Done.

This isn’t science fiction. This is my actual workflow, multiple times per day.

%%{init: {'theme': 'base', 'themeVariables': { 'primaryColor': '#4f46e5', 'primaryTextColor': '#ffffff', 'primaryBorderColor': '#3730a3', 'lineColor': '#6366f1', 'fontSize': '16px' }}}%%
flowchart TB
    A["You describe what you want"] --> B["Cursor analyzes codebase"]
    B --> C["Generates all file changes"]
    C --> D["Shows you diff previews"]
    D --> E{Review each change}
    E -->|Accept| F["Changes applied"]
    E -->|Reject/Modify| G["Refine your prompt"]
    G --> B
    F --> H["Ready to commit"]

The @-Mention System (Cursor’s Secret Sauce)

This is how you give Cursor perfect context:

Example powerful prompt:

@codebase Based on our existing auth patterns, add password reset 
functionality. Reference @file:services/email.ts for email sending 
and @file:models/User.ts for the user model.

Pricing (December 2025)

Available Models (December 2025)

• GPT-5.1-Codex-Max - Frontier coding model (newly supported)
• Claude 4, GPT-4o, GPT-o1
• Bring your own API keys (BYOK) supported

4 Default Layouts (New in v2.3)

• Agent - Optimized for agentic workflows
• Editor - Traditional coding focus
• Zen - Minimal distractions
• Browser - Integrated web testing

Where Cursor Excels

✅ Multi-file editing: Industry-leading Composer

✅ Debug Mode: 🆕 AI-powered root-cause analysis with logging instrumentation

✅ Model flexibility: Frontier models + bring your own API keys

✅ Codebase understanding: @-mentions give precise control

✅ Multi-Agent Judging: 🆕 Parallel evaluation for optimal solutions

Where Cursor Has Weaknesses

❌ Learning curve: Many features to master

❌ Price: $20/month is double Copilot’s base tier

❌ Extension compatibility: Most work, but some have quirks

💡 My Take (Updated December 2025): Cursor continues to lead in agentic coding with Debug Mode, Plan Mode, and Multi-Agent Judging. The Graphite acquisition signals deeper code review integration coming. If you’re doing complex, multi-file development, Cursor remains the gold standard.

Windsurf (Codeium): Major Acquisition in 2025

⚠️ IMPORTANT UPDATE (July 2025): Windsurf/Codeium underwent a major acquisition event that fundamentally changed the company. Existing users should be aware of the new ownership structure.

What Happened to Windsurf

In one of the biggest AI industry shakeups of 2025, Windsurf’s corporate structure was dramatically restructured:

The Timeline:

1. April 2025: Codeium rebranded to Windsurf
2. May 2025: OpenAI agreed to acquire Windsurf for $3 billion (would have been OpenAI’s largest acquisition)
3. July 2025: Microsoft blocked the deal due to intellectual property concerns
4. July 2025: The company was split between two acquirers:
   • Google DeepMind secured a $2.4 billion licensing deal and hired CEO Varun Mohan, co-founder Douglas Chen, and key R&D personnel
   • Cognition (makers of Devin AI) acquired Windsurf’s remaining business, product, brand, IP, and employees

What This Means for Users:

• The Windsurf product continues under Cognition’s ownership
• Google DeepMind has the technology license and key engineering talent
• The future direction of Windsurf is now tied to Cognition’s strategy

Historical Context: What Made Windsurf Notable

Before the acquisition, Windsurf (then Codeium) was known for:

By the numbers (pre-acquisition):

• 800,000+ active developers
• 80x growth since 2023
• 7,000+ companies using Windsurf/Codeium
• Unlimited free completions (most generous in the industry)

Core Features (May Continue Under Cognition)

Cascade: Agentic Coding with Guardrails

Cascade was Windsurf’s answer to Cursor’s Agent mode, featuring more guardrails:

• Cursor Agent: “I’ll do what you asked and figure out the details”
• Windsurf Cascade: “Here’s my plan. Should I proceed with step 1?”

Cascade asks for confirmation more often, making it safer for developers newer to agentic workflows.

Flows: Structured AI Workflows

Flows were Windsurf’s unique differentiator—pre-built “recipes” for common tasks:

• “Add unit tests for this file”
• “Create API endpoint from OpenAPI spec”
• “Refactor to use dependency injection”
• “Generate documentation for module”

Previous Pricing (May Change Under Cognition)

Current Status

⚠️ Ownership: Now owned by Cognition (Devin AI)

⚠️ Technology: Core tech licensed to Google DeepMind

⚠️ Future: Direction depends on Cognition’s product strategy

What This Means for AI IDE Market

The Windsurf acquisition demonstrates the intense competition in AI coding tools:

• OpenAI was willing to pay $3B to compete with Copilot
• Microsoft (Copilot’s owner) blocked to protect its position
• Google acquired the talent for its Antigravity project
• Cognition expanded beyond Devin into full IDE territory

💡 My Take (Updated December 2025): If you’re an existing Windsurf user, monitor Cognition’s announcements for product direction. For new users, I’d recommend Cursor or GitHub Copilot Free until Windsurf’s future becomes clearer. The acquisition split creates uncertainty about long-term support and development.

Google Antigravity: The Agent-First Revolution (New November 2025)

Now we enter the cutting edge. Google Antigravity represents a vision of where AI coding is heading—and it’s both exciting and slightly terrifying.

What It Is

Antigravity is Google’s agent-first IDE, launched on November 18, 2025. It’s not just an AI-assisted editor—it’s a “Mission Control” for managing autonomous coding agents.

Think of the difference like this:

• Copilot/Cursor: You’re the pilot, AI is the co-pilot
• Antigravity: You’re the air traffic controller, AI agents are the pilots

The Two Views

Antigravity has two primary interfaces:

1. Editor View: Familiar VS Code-like editing with AI assistance—similar to Cursor or Copilot

2. Manager Surface: This is the revolutionary part. You can see and manage multiple AI agents working asynchronously across different parts of your codebase. Think of it as a project management dashboard for your AI workers.

What Agents Can Do

Antigravity agents can:

• Plan complex tasks: Break down “build a user dashboard” into dozens of sub-tasks
• Work for extended periods: Some agents can work for days on complex features
• Control the browser: Navigate web pages, test UI, verify functionality
• Execute terminal commands: Install packages, run builds, deploy (with approval)
• Iterate autonomously: Run tests, see failures, fix bugs, try again

Key Features (December 2025)

Powered by Gemini 3

Antigravity uses Google’s Gemini 3 Pro model, which features:

• Advanced reasoning and tool use
• Very long context windows (processing entire codebases)
• Native function calling for agent actions

It also supports Claude 4 Sonnet/Opus and OpenAI models.

The Safety Consideration

Antigravity has experienced notable security events:

Early December 2025: An agent wiped a developer’s entire D: drive without explicit permission. Google quickly added a “Secure Mode” (Dec 4, 2025) that:

• Requires human review for all destructive actions
• Prevents agents from running targeted exploits
• Adds confirmation dialogs for file system changes

December 24, 2025: PromptArmor researchers discovered additional flaws:

• AI agents could potentially run unapproved system commands
• Agents could be exploited through malicious input in source files

These incidents highlight both the power and the risk of truly autonomous agents.

Rate Limits & Pricing (December 2025)

Enterprise pricing expected in 2026.

Where Antigravity Excels

✅ True autonomy: Agents can work independently for extended periods

✅ Artifacts System: 🆕 Structured, verifiable outputs with screenshots

✅ Complex projects: Handles tasks that would take humans days

✅ Multi-agent orchestration: Manage multiple agents simultaneously

✅ Local operation: 🆕 100% local with no telemetry option

Where Antigravity Has Concerns

⚠️ Security vulnerabilities: Dec 24 PromptArmor findings still being addressed

⚠️ Trust: Letting AI run commands requires careful consideration

⚠️ Preview stability: New product, expect rough edges

⚠️ Learning curve: Fundamentally different paradigm

💡 My Take (Updated December 2025): Antigravity is powerful but still maturing. The December security disclosures are concerning—always use Secure Mode and carefully review agent actions. For experimental projects, it’s fascinating. For production work, wait for security hardening.

Amazon Kiro: Spec-Driven Development (v0.8.0)

Amazon’s entry to the agentic IDE space takes a different approach: start with specifications, not code.

What It Is

Kiro is Amazon’s agentic IDE that introduces “spec-driven development”—the idea that you should be able to describe what you want to build in natural language and diagrams, and the AI handles the implementation.

Status (December 2025):

• IDE Version: v0.8.0 (Dec 18, 2025)
• CLI Version: v1.23.0
• Built on: Code OSS (VS Code compatible)
• Philosophy: “From vibe coding to viable code”

The Spec-Driven Approach

Traditional coding:

1. You think about what you want
2. You write code
3. You hope it matches what you thought

Kiro’s approach:

1. You write specs in natural language (or draw diagrams)
2. Kiro translates specs into implementation plans
3. Kiro generates code that matches the specs
4. Kiro keeps specs and code in sync as things change

Core Features (December 2025)

Agent Hooks (Contextual Automation)

When you modify code, Kiro Hooks can automatically:

• Regenerate documentation
• Update tests
• Check for security issues
• Optimize performance
• 🆕 Trigger new action types (Dec 2025)

All running in the background as you save files.

The Autonomous Agent

Kiro includes an autonomous agent that can:

• Work independently for extended periods
• Learn your team’s coding patterns
• Execute complex multi-repo tasks
• Create pull requests automatically
• 🆕 Use parallel subagents for complex work

CLI Features (v1.23.0)

Powered by Anthropic

Kiro primarily uses Claude models from Anthropic (Amazon is a major investor). Future compatibility with other models is planned.

Pricing (December 2025)

Currently in free preview. Tiered pricing (Pro, Pro+, Power) expected after preview.

Where Kiro Excels

✅ Spec-first development: Great for teams who value documentation

✅ Subagents: 🆕 Parallel task execution speeds up complex work

✅ Per-file Code Review: 🆕 Granular control over AI changes

✅ Production readiness: Built-in hooks for tests, docs, security

✅ Multi-repo: Designed for microservices architectures

✅ AWS integration: Natural fit for AWS-heavy shops

Where Kiro Has Limitations

⚠️ Preview stage: Features still evolving rapidly

⚠️ Spec overhead: Requires writing good specs (which some devs resist)

⚠️ AWS-focused: May be less suited for non-AWS environments

💡 My Take (Updated December 2025): Kiro’s December updates (subagents, Plan Agent, per-file review) make it much more practical. The spec-driven approach is ideal for teams with formal requirements processes. The granular code review feature addresses a key concern about trusting AI edits.

Trae (ByteDance): Free AI Coding for Everyone (v3.5.11)

The wildcard in the AI IDE space comes from an unexpected place: ByteDance, the company behind TikTok.

What It Is

Trae is an AI-native IDE that offers free unlimited access to top-tier models including:

• GPT-4o
• Claude 3.5 Sonnet
• Claude 3.7 Sonnet
• DeepSeek R1
• Doubao (ByteDance’s own model)

Current Version: v3.5.11 (December 25, 2025)

Yes, you read that right. Free. Unlimited. GPT-4o.

How Is This Possible?

ByteDance is playing a long game. They’re:

1. Building a developer ecosystem
2. Training their own Doubao model on developer interactions
3. Competing for attention in a market where Cursor and Windsurf are growing fast

Their calculation: The cost of providing free AI is worth it for the data and ecosystem benefits.

Core Features (December 2025)

The Multimodal Angle

One unique feature: Trae can interpret images and screenshots. Upload a Figma design, and Trae will attempt to convert it to responsive HTML/CSS. This is particularly useful for frontend developers.

Privacy Considerations

Reports from July 2025 indicated that Trae sends user data to ByteDance servers, which raised concerns given ByteDance’s Chinese ownership. The app also uses more system resources than standard VS Code.

If data privacy is a concern for your work, this is worth considering carefully.

Pricing

Where Trae Excels

✅ Price: Can’t beat free with unlimited GPT-4o

✅ Code Review: 🆕 Three configurable modes for AI change control

✅ Command Safety: 🆕 Sandbox mode with risk assessment

✅ Multimodal: Image-to-code is genuinely useful

✅ Model variety: Access to multiple top models

Where Trae Has Concerns

⚠️ Privacy: Data sent to ByteDance servers

⚠️ Resource usage: Higher memory consumption than VS Code

⚠️ Trust: Some organizations may not approve ByteDance tools

⚠️ Stability: Anthropic blocked access for Chinese entities in late 2025

💡 My Take (Updated December 2025): Trae’s new Code Review feature and command execution modes (Dec 2025) address safety concerns. Still excellent for personal projects and learning. The SOLO mode integrations (Supabase, Vercel) make it more practical for web development. Privacy remains a consideration for enterprise use.

JetBrains AI Assistant: For the IntelliJ Faithful (December 2025 Update)

Not everyone uses VS Code. If you’re in the JetBrains ecosystem (IntelliJ, PyCharm, WebStorm, Rider), here’s your native option—now with significant December 2025 updates.

What It Is

JetBrains AI Assistant is integrated into all JetBrains IDEs, leveraging their decades of code intelligence to provide AI features that understand your project deeply.

December 2025 Updates

The Integration Advantage

JetBrains has spent 20+ years building intelligent IDEs. Their code analysis, refactoring tools, and debugging capabilities are legendary. AI Assistant builds on this foundation:

• Knows your build system: Maven, Gradle, npm, etc.
• Understands frameworks: Spring, Django, React, Rails
• Sees test results: Integrates with test runners
• Connects to databases: Aware of your schemas
• 🆕 Quota tracking: Transparent AI credit visibility in IDE

Available Models (December 2025)

• Claude 4 Sonnet (GA)
• Grok 4, Grok 4.1 Fast, Grok Code Fast 1 (GA)
• GPT-4o, GPT-4 (via BYOK)
• Local multiline completion for Java and C++

Pricing (December 2025)

Where JetBrains AI Excels

✅ IDE integration: Unmatched understanding of project context

✅ Junie Agent: 🆕 Now includes integrated coding agent

✅ BYOK Support: 🆕 Bring your own API keys

✅ Refactoring: Combines AI with legendary refactoring tools

✅ Enterprise-friendly: Fits well in JetBrains shops

✅ ACP Support: 🆕 Integrate third-party agents via Agent Client Protocol

Where JetBrains AI Has Limitations

⚠️ VS Code users: Not an option if you prefer VS Code

⚠️ Ecosystem lock-in: Requires JetBrains IDE subscription

⚠️ Learning curve for agents: Junie is new, still maturing

💡 My Take (Updated December 2025): JetBrains has made major strides with BYOK support and the Junie agent. If you’re in the JetBrains ecosystem, the AI Assistant is now much more competitive with VS Code-based tools. The ACP support signals future third-party agent integrations.

Security & Privacy: What Enterprise Teams Need to Know

As AI IDEs become essential development tools, security and privacy considerations have moved from “nice to have” to “deal-breaker.” Here’s what you need to know before adopting any AI coding assistant.

Data Handling Comparison

IP Indemnification (Enterprise Critical)

What is IP Indemnification? Protection against lawsuits if AI generates code that infringes on someone else’s intellectual property.

Compliance Certifications

On-Premises & Air-Gapped Options

For organizations that cannot send code to external servers:

Security Best Practices for AI IDEs

1. Sensitive Code Handling

• Never use AI on cryptographic implementations
• Avoid AI for authentication/authorization logic
• Don’t expose API keys, secrets, or credentials in prompts

2. Code Review Requirements

• Establish mandatory human review for AI-generated code
• Use static analysis tools (ESLint, SonarQube) on AI output
• Implement security scanning in CI/CD pipelines

3. Access Control

• Use SSO/SAML for enterprise tools
• Implement role-based access for AI features
• Audit AI usage logs regularly

4. Data Classification

• Define which repositories can use AI assistance
• Exclude sensitive codebases from AI indexing
• Use privacy modes where available

Known Security Incidents (2025)

⚠️ Recommendation: For enterprise use, prioritize tools with explicit IP indemnification (Copilot Enterprise, Kiro Enterprise) or those with on-premises options. For sensitive code, use Antigravity’s 100% Local Mode or JetBrains with local BYOK models.

CLI-Based AI Coding Tools

Not everyone lives in an IDE. If you prefer terminal-based workflows, here are the top AI coding tools for the command line.

Popular CLI Tools (December 2025)

Aider: Git-Aware AI Pair Programming

Aider is the most popular open-source AI coding CLI. It’s unique because it understands your git repository.

Key Features:

• Automatically creates commits for AI changes
• Understands file structure and dependencies
• Works with multiple LLMs (Claude, GPT-4, local models)—see the Running LLMs Locally guide for local setup
• Multi-file editing with automatic git integration

Example workflow:

# Start aider in your project
aider

# Add files to the chat
/add src/components/Header.tsx

# Make a request
Add a dark mode toggle button to the header

# Aider edits files, shows diff, and commits

Best for: Developers who prefer terminal + git workflows, open-source contributors, batch refactoring.

Claude Code: Terminal-Native Coding

Anthropic’s official CLI for using Claude in development workflows.

Key Features:

• Extremely long context (process entire codebases)
• Native tool use (can run commands, edit files)
• Deep code analysis and explanation
• Works alongside any editor

Best for: Code review, architectural analysis, understanding legacy code.

When to Use CLI vs IDE

Hybrid Workflow: Best of Both Worlds

Many developers use both CLI and IDE tools:

1. IDE (Cursor/Copilot) for real-time completions while coding
2. CLI (Aider) for large refactoring tasks or batch changes
3. Claude Code for understanding complex legacy codebases

# Example hybrid workflow
# 1. Use Aider for bulk migrations
aider --message "Migrate all class components to functional components with hooks"

# 2. Open in Cursor for fine-tuning
cursor .

# 3. Use Claude Code for code review
claude-code "Analyze this PR for security issues and performance concerns"

Model Context Protocol (MCP): Understanding the New Standard

MCP is becoming the common language for AI coding tools. Here’s what you need to know.

What is MCP?

Model Context Protocol is a standard protocol that allows AI coding tools to communicate with external data sources and tools. Think of it as a “USB for AI”—a universal interface that lets AI agents access:

• Documentation
• APIs and databases
• File systems
• External tools

Why MCP Matters

Before MCP, each AI tool had its own way of connecting to external resources. MCP standardizes this:

MCP Support by Tool (December 2025)

Common MCP Servers

Setting Up MCP (Example: Cursor)

// ~/.cursor/mcp_config.json
{
  "servers": [
    {
      "name": "postgres",
      "command": "mcp-server-postgres",
      "args": ["postgresql://localhost/mydb"]
    },
    {
      "name": "github",
      "command": "mcp-server-github",
      "env": { "GITHUB_TOKEN": "<your-token>" }
    }
  ]
}

Once configured, you can ask: “What tables exist in our database?” and the AI can query the schema directly.

Open Source & Local Alternatives

For developers who prioritize privacy or work in air-gapped environments.

Local LLM Options

Running Local Models

Option 1: Ollama (Easiest)

# Install Ollama
curl -fsSL https://ollama.ai/install.sh | sh

# Pull a coding model
ollama pull codellama:13b

# Use with Cursor (BYOK)
# Settings → Models → Add Custom → http://localhost:11434

Option 2: LM Studio

• GUI-based model management
• One-click downloads
• OpenAI-compatible API

Option 3: Text Generation WebUI

• More control over generation settings
• Advanced quantization support

Privacy Comparison

When to Use Local Models

✅ Use local models when:

• Working on classified or highly sensitive code
• In air-gapped environments
• Company policy prohibits cloud AI
• Internet connectivity is unreliable
• Cost optimization is critical

❌ Avoid local models when:

• Need cutting-edge quality (Claude 4, GPT-4o)
• Hardware is limited (less than 16GB RAM)
• Speed is critical

Open Source IDE Alternatives

Integration with Other Tools

AI IDEs don’t exist in isolation. Here’s how they connect to your broader development ecosystem.

Design Tools

Example workflow:

1. Screenshot your Figma design
2. Drop into Trae or Cursor chat
3. AI generates responsive HTML/CSS/React

Project Management

Example with GitHub Issues:

Context: @issue:github.com/org/repo/issues/123

Implement this issue. Follow our existing patterns from @file:src/api/

CI/CD Integration

Example: GitHub Actions with Copilot

name: AI Code Review
on: pull_request

jobs:
  ai-review:
    runs-on: ubuntu-latest
    steps:
      - uses: actions/checkout@v4
      - uses: github/copilot-security-review-action@v1
        with:
          github-token: ${{ secrets.GITHUB_TOKEN }}

Communication Tools

Head-to-Head Comparison

Let’s put it all together with current data.

Decision Flowchart (Updated December 2025)

%%{init: {'theme': 'base', 'themeVariables': { 'primaryColor': '#4f46e5', 'primaryTextColor': '#ffffff', 'primaryBorderColor': '#3730a3', 'lineColor': '#6366f1', 'fontSize': '16px' }}}%%
flowchart TD
    A["What's Your Priority?"] --> B{Budget: $0?}
    B -->|Yes| C{Privacy concerns?}
    C -->|Yes| D["Copilot Free"]
    C -->|No| E["Trae (free GPT-4o)"]
    B -->|No| F{Want cutting-edge agentic?}
    F -->|Yes| G{Comfortable with preview?}
    G -->|Yes| H["Antigravity or Kiro"]
    G -->|No| I["Cursor Pro ($20/mo)"]
    F -->|No| J{Enterprise/Corporate?}
    J -->|Yes| K["Copilot Business/Enterprise"]
    J -->|No| L["Cursor Pro"]

⚠️ Note: Windsurf was acquired in July 2025. See the Windsurf section for current recommendations.

Getting Started: 5-Minute Setup Guides

Ready to try an AI IDE? Here’s how to get up and running quickly with each major tool.

GitHub Copilot Quick Start

Time to first suggestion: ~3 minutes

# 1. Install the extension in VS Code
# Open VS Code → Extensions → Search "GitHub Copilot" → Install

# 2. Sign in with your GitHub account
# Click the Copilot icon in the status bar → Sign In

# 3. Start coding!
# Open any file and begin typing—suggestions appear automatically

First thing to try: Open a new file, write a comment // function to validate email address and press Enter. Watch Copilot generate the implementation.

Cursor Quick Start

Time to first suggestion: ~5 minutes

# 1. Download from cursor.com
# Choose macOS, Windows, or Linux

# 2. Import VS Code settings (optional but recommended)
# File → Import VS Code Settings

# 3. Sign up/in to Cursor
# Required for AI features

# 4. Open your project
cursor /path/to/project

First thing to try: Press Cmd/Ctrl + Shift + I to open Composer. Type “Explain this codebase to me” and let Cursor analyze your project.

Antigravity Quick Start

Time to first agent: ~5 minutes

# 1. Download from antigravity.google
# Sign in with Google account

# 2. Open a project
# File → Open Folder

# 3. Start an agent
# Press the Agent button or use Cmd/Ctrl + E
# Type your task: "Add a user profile page to this app"

First thing to try: Use “Manager View” to see your agent working. Create a simple task and watch it plan and execute.

Kiro Quick Start

Time to first spec: ~5 minutes

# 1. Download from kiro.dev
# Sign in with Amazon/AWS account

# 2. Create or open a project
# Kiro works best with existing codebases

# 3. Create your first spec
# File → New Kiro Spec → Describe what you want to build

First thing to try: Create a spec like “Add a REST API endpoint for user registration with email validation and password requirements.”

Configuration Optimization Tips

For best performance across all tools:

Essential keyboard shortcuts to master:

AI IDEs for Specific Use Cases

Different development contexts have different needs. Here’s which tool excels in each scenario.

Frontend Development (React, Vue, Svelte, Next.js)

Best Choice: Cursor

• Composer excels at component refactoring
• Visual Web Editor for real-time design changes
• Multimodal: Convert Figma designs to code

Runner-up: Copilot + Trae

• Copilot: Best inline completions for TSX/JSX
• Trae: Free image-to-code for Figma screenshots

Pro Tips:

• Use @docs https://react.dev to pull in React documentation
• For styling, specify your system: “Use Tailwind” or “Use CSS Modules”
• Ask for “accessible components with ARIA attributes”

Backend Development (APIs, Microservices, Databases)

Best Choice: Kiro

• Spec-driven development is perfect for API design
• Agent Hooks auto-generate OpenAPI docs
• Multi-repo support for microservices

Runner-up: Cursor or Copilot

• Cursor: Great for complex business logic across files
• Copilot: Excellent for SQL queries and database code

Pro Tips:

• Start with specs before code: “Create an OpenAPI spec for user management API”
• Reference existing patterns: “@file:routes/users.ts follow this pattern”
• Ask for validation: “Include input validation and error handling”

Mobile Development (React Native, Flutter, Swift, Kotlin)

Best Choice: JetBrains AI (for native) or Cursor (for cross-platform)

• JetBrains: Deep understanding of Android Studio / Xcode patterns
• Cursor: Great for React Native with its multi-file editing

Pro Tips:

• For Flutter: Copilot has strong Dart support
• For Swift: JetBrains AI with AppCode integration
• For React Native: Cursor’s Composer handles component refactoring

DevOps & Infrastructure (Terraform, Kubernetes, CI/CD)

Best Choice: Copilot

• Excellent support for Terraform HCL
• Strong YAML completion for Kubernetes manifests
• GitHub Actions first-party support

Runner-up: Kiro

• Spec-driven approach works well for infrastructure
• Can describe desired state in natural language

Pro Tips:

• Be explicit about cloud provider: “AWS us-east-1” or “GCP europe-west1”
• Reference existing modules: “@file:modules/vpc/main.tf”
• Ask for cost considerations: “Optimize for cost using reserved instances”

Data Science & Machine Learning

Best Choice: JetBrains AI (PyCharm) or Cursor

• PyCharm: Deep Jupyter integration, data viz understanding
• Cursor: Good for ML pipelines and training scripts

Pro Tips:

• For Jupyter: JetBrains or continue using Jupyter AI
• For production ML: Cursor’s multi-file editing for pipelines
• Always ask for: “Include type hints and docstrings”

Legacy Code Modernization

Best Choice: Claude Code (CLI) + Cursor

• Claude Code: Long-context analysis of entire legacy codebases
• Cursor: Multi-file refactoring with Composer

Pro Tips:

• Start with analysis: “Explain this codebase’s architecture”
• Ask for incremental changes: “Refactor this module without changing the API”
• Request test coverage: “Add tests before refactoring”

Open Source Contribution

Best Choice: Aider (CLI) + Cursor

• Aider: Git-aware, creates commits automatically
• Cursor: Code exploration and understanding

Pro Tips:

• Aider integrates with git for clean PRs
• Use for: “Fix this issue: [paste issue description]”
• Always review before committing

Language & Framework Support

Not all AI IDEs are equally good at all languages. Here’s a detailed breakdown.

Programming Language Quality

Key Insights:

• JetBrains has the deepest language understanding due to decades of IDE development
• Copilot is the best generalist, trained on massive GitHub data
• Cursor matches Copilot for popular languages but excels in multi-file operations
• Kiro is optimized for web and cloud-native development

Framework-Specific Recommendations

Complete Pricing Analysis

Understanding the full cost helps make the right decision.

Individual Developer (Annual Cost)

Team of 10 (Annual Cost)

Which Plan Do You Actually Need?

Cost vs Productivity Analysis

Bottom line: Even the most expensive individual plan ($468/year for Copilot Pro+) pays for itself if it saves just 5 hours of work per year at typical developer rates.

Maximizing Productivity: What the Research Shows

Let’s look at what actually works, backed by data.

Key Research Findings (2025)

The Art of Prompting for Code

Prompting for code is different from prompting for chat. Here’s what works:

1. Be specific about context

❌ “Fix this”

✅ “In this React component, the useEffect has a memory leak. It should clean up the subscription on unmount.”

2. Reference existing patterns

“Follow the style we use in utils/api.ts” is more effective than describing the style.

3. Specify constraints

“No external dependencies.” “TypeScript strict mode.” “Must work with Node 18.”

4. Include edge cases

“Handle null inputs and empty arrays gracefully.”

5. State the goal, not just the task

“The user should be able to reset their password via email” beats “add a reset password function.”

Prompting Templates

Workflow Strategies

Strategy 1: AI-First for Boilerplate

Use AI for repetitive code—tests, API clients, CRUD operations. Save your brain for business logic.

Strategy 2: AI as Reviewer

Write code yourself, then ask: “Review this code for bugs, performance issues, and improvements.” You’ll catch issues and learn new patterns.

Strategy 3: Exploratory Coding

Try ambitious features you’d normally avoid. “Can you help me implement real-time collaboration?” AI makes complexity accessible.

Common Mistakes

1. Accepting without reviewing: AI code can have subtle bugs
2. Accepting without understanding: If you can’t explain it, don’t ship it
3. Under-providing context: More context = better results
4. Not iterating: AI responses often need 2-3 rounds of refinement

Troubleshooting Common Issues

AI IDEs aren’t perfect. Here’s how to solve the most common problems.

”AI Suggestions Are Irrelevant or Wrong”

Symptoms: Suggestions don’t match your codebase style, wrong framework assumptions, outdated patterns.

Solutions:

1. Add more context with @-mentions: @file:styles/theme.ts, @codebase
2. Re-index your project: In Cursor, use “Rebuild Index”; in Copilot, reload the window
3. Close unrelated files: AI uses open files for context—too many files confuses it
4. Be specific in comments: Instead of // handle errors, write // catch and log database connection errors, retry 3 times

Prevention: Use .cursorignore or .copilotignore to exclude irrelevant files (node_modules, dist, etc.)

”Performance Is Slow or Laggy”

Symptoms: Suggestions take 5+ seconds, editor freezes, high CPU usage.

Solutions:

Prevention: Set suggestion delay to 300ms+ if you type faster than suggestions arrive.

”I Hit Rate Limits”

Symptoms: “Rate limit exceeded” errors, suggestions stop working.

Solutions by tool:

Prevention:

• Use simpler requests for routine tasks (saves premium requests)
• Batch complex work into fewer, more comprehensive prompts

”AI Made Breaking Changes”

Symptoms: Code that worked no longer compiles, tests fail, runtime errors.

Solutions:

1. Immediate: Use git to revert: git checkout -- . or git stash
2. In Cursor: Click “Reject All” in the diff preview
3. In Copilot Edits: Undo with Cmd/Ctrl+Z
4. In Kiro: Use per-file code review to reject specific changes

Prevention:

• Always review diffs before accepting
• Run tests before committing AI changes
• Use version control branches for AI experiments

”Extensions Are Conflicting”

Symptoms: Multiple suggestion popups, duplicate completions, crashes.

Solutions:

1. Disable competing AI extensions (can only have one active)
2. Common conflicts:
   • Copilot + Cursor = Issues (Cursor has built-in)
   • Copilot + Tabnine = Overlapping suggestions
   • Multiple language server extensions

Prevention: Choose one AI IDE/extension and commit to it.

”Secure/Privacy Mode Issues”

Symptoms: Features not working, slower responses, limited capabilities.

This is expected behavior. Privacy modes intentionally limit functionality:

• Cursor Privacy Mode: No code stored in logs
• Antigravity Secure Mode: Human review required for all actions
• Kiro Supervised Mode: Approval required for file changes

Trade-off: More security = slower workflows. Adjust based on your security requirements.

AI IDEs for Teams & Enterprise

Rolling out AI coding tools across a team or organization requires planning.

Phased Rollout Strategy

Phase 1: Pilot (2-4 weeks)

• Select 5-10 developers across different roles
• Choose one tool (recommendation: Cursor or Copilot)
• Establish baseline metrics before rollout

Phase 2: Training (1-2 weeks)

• Provide structured training on prompting best practices
• Share team-specific prompt libraries
• Establish code review guidelines for AI-generated code

Phase 3: Expansion (2-4 weeks)

• Roll out to full team
• Monitor usage and productivity metrics
• Collect feedback and iterate on guidelines

Phase 4: Optimization (Ongoing)

• Tune settings based on learnings
• Update training materials
• Evaluate new tools and features quarterly

Measuring ROI

Enterprise Tool Comparison

Governance Policy Template

# AI Coding Assistant Usage Policy

## Approved Tools
- Primary: [Copilot Business / Cursor Business]
- Approved for experimentation: [Antigravity, Kiro]

## Data Classification
- ✅ Can use AI: Internal applications, open-source work
- ⚠️ Requires approval: Customer-facing code
- ❌ Prohibited: Security-critical, cryptographic, personally identifiable data

## Code Review Requirements
- All AI-generated code requires human review
- Security scan must pass before merge
- Author must understand and be able to explain all code

## Training Requirements
- Complete AI IDE onboarding (2 hours)
- Attend quarterly best practices session
- Review updated guidelines after each tool update

Cost Optimization for Teams

Real-World Case Studies

Here’s how teams are actually using AI IDEs in production.

Case Study 1: Startup MVP Acceleration

Company: Early-stage fintech startup (5 developers)
Tool: Cursor Pro
Challenge: Build MVP in 3 weeks instead of 6

Results:

• MVP delivered in 2.5 weeks (58% faster)
• 73% of boilerplate code generated by AI
• Developers focused on business logic and architecture
• Zero critical bugs in first production release

Key Insight: “Cursor’s Composer let us describe entire features and get working implementations in minutes. We spent our time reviewing and refining, not writing CRUD operations.” — CTO

Case Study 2: Enterprise Legacy Modernization

Company: Fortune 500 financial services (200+ developers)
Tool: GitHub Copilot Enterprise
Challenge: Modernize 15-year-old Java monolith

Results:

• 40% faster refactoring tasks
• 3x faster test coverage improvement (20% → 60%)
• Documentation generation saved 2,000+ hours
• Developers reported 67% improvement in job satisfaction

Key Insight: “The IP indemnification was non-negotiable for us. Copilot Enterprise gave us the legal protection we needed to adopt AI at scale.” — VP of Engineering

Case Study 3: Open Source Project Maintenance

Project: Popular React component library
Tools: Aider + Cursor
Challenge: Manage 500+ open issues with 3 maintainers

Results:

• Issue resolution time dropped from 14 days to 5 days
• Pull request review time reduced by 50%
• Contributors onboard 2x faster with AI-explained codebase
• Automated changelog generation

Key Insight: “Aider’s git integration is perfect for open source. It creates clean commits, and we can review AI changes just like human contributions.” — Lead Maintainer

Case Study 4: Agency Rapid Prototyping

Company: Digital agency (15 developers)
Tool: Trae (free tier)
Challenge: Build client prototypes faster

Results:

• Prototype time reduced from 5 days to 2 days
• Design-to-code using Trae’s multimodal input
• Cost savings: $0 (free tier sufficient)
• Clients impressed with faster turnaround

Key Insight: “For client prototypes where privacy isn’t a concern, Trae’s free GPT-4o access is incredible value. We save the budget for production tools.” — Creative Director

Advanced Productivity Techniques

For power users who want to maximize AI IDE effectiveness.

Context Engineering

The quality of AI output depends entirely on context. Here’s how to optimize it.

The Context Pyramid:

1. System context (automatic): Your project files, structure, dependencies
2. Session context: Recent messages in the current conversation
3. Prompt context: What you explicitly include in your request
4. Referenced context: Files and docs you @-mention

Advanced context techniques:

# Bad: No context
Add a button

# Good: Full context
@file:components/Button.tsx Following our existing Button component pattern,
add a new "danger" variant with red styling. Use our design tokens from 
@file:styles/tokens.ts and ensure it matches the existing hover animations.
Should be accessible with proper ARIA attributes.

Custom Prompt Libraries

Build reusable prompts for common tasks:

When NOT to Use AI

AI excels at many tasks, but these warrant extra caution:

Multi-Agent Workflows

With tools like Cursor’s Multi-Agent Judging and Antigravity’s Manager View, you can now orchestrate multiple AI agents:

Example: Feature Development Pipeline

1. Planning Agent: Breaks down the task into sub-tasks
2. Implementation Agents (parallel): Each works on a sub-task
3. Review Agent: Evaluates all implementations, picks the best
4. Testing Agent: Generates and runs tests

How to use in Cursor (2.3+):

Enable Plan Mode → Describe the feature → 
Let agents propose approaches → 
Multi-Agent Judging selects the best → 
Review and accept

Continuous Learning

AI models and tools update frequently. Stay current:

1. Follow changelogs: Cursor, Copilot, and others release weekly updates
2. Join communities: Cursor Discord, Reddit r/AICoding, Twitter #AIcoding
3. Experiment quarterly: Try new tools like Antigravity and Kiro
4. Share learnings: Document what works for your team

The Agentic Future: What’s Coming

We’re in the early innings of a fundamental shift.

Near-term (2025-2026)

• Complete features from specs: “Build me a settings page” → Done
• Auto PR creation: Code complete → Tests pass → PR ready for review
• Self-healing code: Test fails → AI diagnoses → AI fixes → Tests pass
• Design-to-code: Figma → Production React (already starting with Trae)

Medium-term (2026-2028)

• AI maintaining legacy code: Read → Understand → Safely update
• Natural language programming: Non-developers building apps
• AI-to-AI code review: Agent writes, another agent reviews
• Full pipeline automation: Ticket → Code → Test → Deploy → Monitor

Preparing for This Future

1. Learn to describe intent clearly: The better you articulate goals, the better AI delivers
2. Focus on architecture: AI can write code; system design still requires humans
3. Develop review skills: You’ll review more than you write
4. Understand AI limitations: Know when AI is likely wrong
5. Build testing discipline: AI code needs verification

Making Your Choice

Key Takeaways (December 2025)

1. AI IDEs have evolved from autocomplete to autonomous agents in just 4 years
2. GitHub Copilot (20M+ users): Now with Free tier, Agent Mode, and Copilot Memory
3. Cursor ($10B valuation talks): Best multi-file editing with new Debug Mode and Plan Mode
4. Windsurf: Acquired in July 2025—split between Google DeepMind and Cognition
5. Antigravity: Powerful but needs Secure Mode due to December security findings
6. Kiro (v0.8.0): Practical updates with subagents and per-file code review
7. Trae (v3.5.11): New Code Review feature and command safety modes
8. JetBrains: Now competitive with BYOK support and Junie agent
9. Productivity gains of 55%+ are real and measurable
10. The future is agentic: AI will plan and execute, not just suggest

Quick Decision Guide (December 2025)

Next Steps

1. Pick one and commit for 2 weeks. Constant switching prevents fluency.
2. Start simple. Get comfortable with completions before multi-file edits.
3. Join communities. Cursor Discord, Reddit r/developersWithAI, Twitter #AIcoding.
4. Experiment with agentic features. The biggest productivity gains are there.

What’s Next?

This is part of a larger series on AI for developers:

• CLI Tools for AI: Aider, Shell-GPT, Copilot CLI
• Building AI-Powered Apps: From API calls to deployed product
• RAG and Embeddings: Building with your own knowledge bases

The AI developer toolkit is expanding fast. Stay curious, keep experimenting, and don’t be afraid to let the machines handle the boring parts.

Now go try one of these tools on your actual codebase. The best way to understand AI IDEs is to use them. Start with something small and see how it feels. You might just have a “this changes everything” moment of your own.

Key Takeaways

• AI IDEs have evolved from autocomplete to autonomous agents in 4 years
• GitHub Copilot leads adoption with 20M+ users, now offers Free tier with Agent Mode
• Cursor leads in multi-file editing with $10B valuation talks and new Debug/Plan modes
• Windsurf was acquired in July 2025 (Google DeepMind + Cognition split)
• Antigravity is powerful but has known security concerns (use Secure Mode)
• Kiro (v0.8.0) adds practical features: subagents, per-file review
• Trae (v3.5.11) provides free GPT-4o with new safety features
• JetBrains AI now competitive with BYOK and Junie agent
• Productivity gains of 55% are measurable and documented
• Your role evolves: More architecture and review, less typing

The revolution is here. The only question is whether you’re driving or being driven.

Sources cited in this article:

• GitHub Blog - Copilot Research
• GitHub Blog - User Statistics
• Sacra Research - Cursor Analysis
• Sacra Research - Codeium/Windsurf Analysis
• Google Blog - Antigravity Launch
• AWS Blog - Kiro Launch
• Stack Overflow Developer Survey 2025

Related Articles:

• How to Talk to AI: Prompt Engineering Fundamentals
• Advanced Prompt Engineering: Techniques That Work
• AI Search Engines: The Future of Finding Information